How healthy is the link profile

Scores the client's link profile 0–100 (a heuristic, said so) from seven factors, each good, warn or critical with its figures and the source they came from (the vendor's synced index, our own link index, the domain graph): referring domains (20: over 100 good, under 20 critical), quality distribution (20: the linking sites' authority, and domain diversity — one site over 10% of the links warns, over 25% is critical), anchor naturalness (15: the anchor bands of get_anchor_distribution), toxic ratio (20: the share of linking sites get_toxic_link_risk calls toxic), velocity (10: a fall in referring domains of over 20% a quarter is critical), follow ratio (5: over 60% followed good, under 40% critical) and geographic relevance (10: the linking sites' TLD and country mix against the client's market; 80% or more from other countries flags a private network). Each factor carries its source's confidence (DataForSEO 1.0, our link index 0.7, Common Crawl 0.5), which scales its weight; a number only when at least four factors have data, and never from presence-only sources alone (NOT ASSESSED); otherwise INSUFFICIENT DATA (X/7). industry (saas, ecommerce, local, publisher, agency) judges the anchors against that industry's natural ranges. Also the profile's toxic signals: 50+ directory links, linking pages with 10,000+ outbound links, more than 50 links from one site, linking pages under 100 words, reciprocal links. Pass moneyTerms to tell exact and partial-match anchors apart. Spam scores sharpen the toxic ratio: fetchSpamScores: true buys them inside this call (one paid DataForSEO request of up to 1,000 linking sites, the price of get_backlink_spam_scores; sites scored in the last 30 days are reused free; quote it with estimate_cost or dryRun first), or pass spamScores you already have. Answers 'how healthy are our backlinks' and 'is our link profile at risk'. Free without fetchSpamScores.